Hi Jared,
I can think of three options for you, all of which would involve broadening your objective slightly. First, you could go with the option your advisor suggested--take faculty members from colleges X, A, and B, but that, as you pointed out, creates a problem if you want to focus solely on students from college X.
The second option is to add faculty from additional departments at College X instead of additional schools. I don't know what your department is, but let's say, for example, you are in statistics. There may only be 30 faculty available in the statistics department, but you could get additional faculty from similar departments such as math or economics. You would just need to change your objective slightly to say "in departments X, Y, and Z" or "in quantitative disciplines," as in the case above.
The third option is the one you suggested last: make the sample sizes 30 students and 30 faculty members. You are correct in that this is relatively small n--typically we want n to be at least 50; some textbooks say 75, but every study has limitations and, of those I've read, every study includes a specific limitations section, where you could mention your small sample size and explain the reason it is so small.
In my opinion, option 2 is the best in a vacuum. If it is practical to use faculty from other departments that your students have had classes with, I think it has the least impact on your analysis. However, I realize that it may not be practical at some colleges, in which case you would need to go with options 1 or 3.
I hope this helps.

Joshua L.
01/09/24
Jared Moises M.
All of them are in urban and are well known here. If I were to adjust the sample size of faculty members in each college equally or near to 30 (let's say around 30 each for college X, A, and B), would the error of the third variable "error" be reduced?01/10/24

Joshua L.
01/10/24
Jared Moises M.
Thank you so much for this insight! I do still have a question: If I do the correlation analysis of KAP between students and faculty members, will I have a problem there? For example, a correlation between the knowledge of pharmacy students and pharmacy faculty members regarding a certain event. Would there be an issue here since the students will be from college X while the faculty will be coming from college X, A, and B despite that all of them will be coming from the same department?01/10/24

Joshua L.
01/10/24
Jared Moises M.
Thank you for enlightening me. I truly appreciate your efforts! Maybe I'll ask again if there's any question that come to my mind after sometime if that's fine with you. Once again, thank you so much!! :))01/11/24
Jared Moises M.
Thank you for your suggestions. I do agree I need to broaden my objective wherein I won't be specifying what college, but I'll still be including my department (Pharmacy) stated there. My study only revolves on the pharmacy department as its limitation. Another limitation is that we'll be taking students and faculty members solely from college X, then college A & B will supplement the remaining sample size for faculty members. I feel like I need to follow my thesis advisor, but when I do the correlation analysis, would there be a huge conceptual error? Or I could just be careful on discussing the results that would not lead to misrepresentation wherein the discussion would not only revolve to college X, but also add a few details for college A and B? Thank you again!01/09/24