I agree with Raymond's method; conditional probability questions are often easiest to understand if you represent the probabilities as frequencies over some large set of people.
I want to point out that Raymond made a minor reading error: The incidence is .7%, not 70%. This changes the answer a bit! Maybe you can try to follow his method with the corrected incidence plugged in. If you have 100 people, how many will have the disease? Not 70; something 100 times smaller than that. Actually, you might prefer to consider a larger set of people--like a million--because then you will avoid having fractions of people. Mathematically, this doesn't change anything, but it might make the numbers easier to intuit.
If there really is a disease with a 70% incidence rate, hopefully it's pretty minor!