
Proving Concave Quadrilateral is a Parallelogram
Given quadrilateral ABCD
with all interior angles less than 180 degrees,
and given that:
AB is congruent to CD
Angle B is congruent to angle D
Prove ABCD is a parallelogram
3 Answers By Expert Tutors
William C. answered 11/11/23
Experienced Tutor Specializing in Chemistry, Math, and Physics
I made a couple of modifications to my previous answer. These are highlighted in red.
sin(B)/AC = sin(δ)/AB and sin(D)/AC = sin(θ)/CD (Law of Sines)
So sin(B)/AC =sin(D)/AC (since ∠B ≅ ∠D)
which means that sin(δ)/AB = sin(θ)/CD (substitution; they're equal to equal things)
So sin(δ) = sin(θ) (since AB = CD)
which means that either δ = θ or δ = 180 – θ
So ∠DAC and ∠BCA can be, but don't have to be, congruent angles
In the case where ∠DAC ≅ ∠BCA we have
ΔABC ≅ ΔCDA (AAS congruence)
segment BC ≅ segment DA (congruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent)
ABCD is a parallelogram → If both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are
congruent, then the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
It is possible, however, to draw a quadrilateral that is not a parallelogram where
AB is congruent to CD, and
Angle B is congruent to angle D
A Desmos graph showing and example of this: desmos.com/calculator/hudpikaz0i

Dayv O.
William, this is exactly my conclusion also. In Mathematics Stack Exchange,,,math.stackexchange.com/questions/2778045/if-a-quadrilateral-has-a-pair-of-equal-opposite-sides-and-a-pair-of-equal-oppos,,, a few experts disagree. The most compelling argument was the one with a cord in circle. It seems there is some disagreement on this.11/11/23

Dayv O.
Also, if it can be proven with trigonometry, then it can be proved with geometry,11/11/23

William C.
11/12/23

William C.
11/12/23

Dayv O.
I expect that the contention is related non-concave quadrilaterals. Later I expect to find the exact mistakes on math stack.11/12/23

William C.
11/12/23

William C.
11/12/23

William C.
11/12/23

Dayv O.
grazie as they say in Italy, aka thanks helping me learn.11/12/23

Dayv O. answered 11/12/23
Caring Super Enthusiastic Knowledgeable Trigonometry Tutor
This was my own question, and through much thinking
and with help from William C.'s comments I have
found that the conclusion cannot be proved.
Given ABCD is a parallelogram, then it will have
as part of it's description the one side will be congruent
to its opposite side, and one angle congruent to
its opposite angle.
However just being given a concave (normal looking)
quadrilateral ABCD with AB congruent to CD
and angle B congruent to angle D (see diagram),
then it cannot be concluded that ABCD is a parallelogram.
Example:AB=CD=4√2,,,,AD=5,,,,BC=3,,,diagonal AC=√17
angle B=qngle D=45 degrees,,,
angle BCA=104 degrees,,,,,,angleDCA=59 degrees
so angle C=163
angle DAC=76 degrees, angle CAB=31 degrees
so angle A=107 degrees

Mark M. answered 11/11/23
Mathematics Teacher - NCLB Highly Qualified
Here are some facts with which to do the proof
∠A ≅ ∠B
∠A is supplementary to ∠D
AB || DC

Dayv O.
Mark, please see math.stackexchange.com/questions/2778045/if-a-quadrilateral-has-a-pair-of-equal-opposite-sides-and-a-pair-of-equal-oppos,,,,I think those answers are incorrect, but there is some sort of disagreement in the math community.11/11/23
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Dayv O.
see below where it si found the hypothesis is not provable.11/12/23