Michael D. answered 03/24/23
Maths, Stats, and CompSci Tutoring from a former University Professor
The given information and wording makes this question a bit ambiguous; this will become more clear in a bit. I'm NOT going to assume that the population percentage for the current year is equal to 75%.
Under the given assumptions, it's reasonable to assume that the sample proportions (for all samples of size 117) follow a Normal distribution with:
Mean = p (the true population proportion for this year)
Standard Deviation = sqrt(p*(1-p)/117)
"2 percent more than the population proportion" is given by the expression (p + .02). We can (almost) compute the z-score for this value by the usual formula:
z = ([Actual Value] - [Mean]) / (Standard Deviation)
The numerator is [p + .02] - [p] = .02, so it doesn't matter that the true value of p is unknown.
To compute the denominator, we need an actual numerical value of p. The best we can do is approximate it using last year's value of p = .75, giving an approximate Standard Deviation of .0400 using the formula above.
Thus the z-score for "2 percent more than the population proportion" is
z = (.02)/(.0400) = .4996
You can use technology or a standard Normal table to find the proportion of values with a z-score *less than* this (if you're still using tables, round to z = 0.50 first); I get a proportion of .6913 using Geogebra with the unrounded z-score.
The probability of getting a z-score greater than this will be 1 - .6913 = .3087; this is what the question is asking.
Jocelinn B.
thank you03/24/23