Adem C. answered 03/23/23
5-year experience teaching
(a) A complete second-order model for E(y) as a function of x1 and x2 is given by:
E(y) = β0 + β1x1 + β2x2 + β3x1^2 + β4x2^2 + β5x1x2
where β0, β1, β2, β3, β4, and β5 are the parameters to be estimated.
(b) For non-coached students (x2 = 0), the equation of the curve relating E(y) to x1 is:
E(y) = β0 + β1x1 + β3x1^2
The y-intercept is β0, which represents the expected SAT-Math score for a student with a PSAT score of 0 who did not receive coaching. The shift parameter is β1, which represents the expected change in SAT-Math score for a one-unit increase in PSAT score for non-coached students. The rate of curvature is β3, which represents the expected change in the slope of the curve for a one-unit increase in PSAT score.
(c) For coached students (x2 = 1), the equation of the curve relating E(y) to x1 is:
E(y) = β0 + β1x1 + β2 + β3x1^2 + β4
The y-intercept is β0 + β2, which represents the expected SAT-Math score for a student with a PSAT score of 0 who received coaching. The shift parameter is β1, which represents the expected change in SAT-Math score for a one-unit increase in PSAT score for coached students. The rate of curvature is β3, which represents the expected change in the slope of the curve for a one-unit increase in PSAT score. The term β4 represents the expected difference in the rate of change between coached and non-coached students.
(d) To test whether coaching has an effect on SAT-Math scores, we can conduct a hypothesis test on the coefficient of x2 (β2). The null hypothesis would be that β2 = 0, indicating that coaching has no effect on SAT-Math scores, while the alternative hypothesis would be that β2 ≠ 0, indicating that coaching does have an effect. We can use a t-test or an F-test to test this hypothesis, depending on the specific details of the regression analysis.