None of the above -- a relative max or min for f'(x) indicates an inflection point for f, and a relative min or max of f indicates a change of sign for f'. And the sign of f" indicates the concavity of f. But a relative max or min for f " bears no discernible relation to the graph of f -- certainly not any of those listed.
Bob M.
asked 05/06/21calculus help would be greatly appreciated
If the graph of f " (x) is continuous and has a relative maximum at x = c, which of the following must be true?
The graph of f has an x-intercept at x = c.
The graph of f has an inflection point at x = c.
The graph of f has a relative minimum at x = c
None of the above is necessarily true
2 Answers By Expert Tutors
I believe the answer is none of the above is necessarily true.
When given info about f '', the most you can really do usually is think about f '' = 0 to look for concavity or points of inflection. Extrema of f '' do not give any of the information listed in the options.
For f to have an x-intercept at c that means f(x) = 0.
For f to have a point of inflection at x = c means f ''(x) must change sign there (meaning f changes concavity).
For f to have a relative minimum at x = c, one of the following must be true
1st Derivative Test: f '(c) = 0 and changes from negative to positive
2nd Derivative Test for Extrema: f '(c) = 0 and f '' (c) > 0
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.