Brian P.

asked • 03/09/21

Transitive Property of Congruence vs. Equality

XWY and RTU are supplementary        Given

XWY + RTU=180 Definition of Supplementary Angles

RTU +UTW = 180  Angles forming a linear pair sum to 180

XWY + RTU = RTU +UTW    Transitive Property Of Equality

XWY= UTW Algebra

VX || SU   Converse Of Corresponding Angles

Question area in bold:


I am trying to determine whether to use the transitive property of equality vs. congruence. My understanding was that equality came from real numbers, measurements etc, whereas congruence was formed from angles, such as the proof given above. This proof is also an answer from an IXL question(Geometry D.6).

I believed it to be Transitive Property Of Congruence, given what I though was a solid understanding. ????

1 Expert Answer

By:

Brian P.

Here is another example and I don't see the sums being added together, and yet is still the Transitive Property of Equality.?? 1 FG⟂GH Given 2 JK⟂ IJGiven 3 m∠FGH=90° Definition of perpendicular lines 4 m∠IJK=90° Definition of perpendicular lines 5 m∠FGH=m∠IJK Transitive Property of Equality<<<<<<<<<<<<< 6 ∠IJK≅∠FGH Definition of Congruence
Report

03/10/21

Philip P.

tutor
When you deal with the measures of angles or with the sums, product, or difference of measures, you're dealing with numbers. Numbers are equal, not congruent. If you're equating numbers, use the properties of equality.
Report

03/10/21

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.