David B. answered 03/14/21
Math and Statistics need not be scary
As always, we establish the conditions.
First, because the data on the ENTIRE population is known, not just a sample of the population, we assume we have correct population parameters.
Second, due to the Gausian nature of the changes in individual trash deposits, we can assume a normal distribution of the load of trash being delivered on a weekly basis. (note: the CLT, which deals with the measure of the mean is not sufficient to support this assumption)
Third, the amount of waste delivered by any household in any week is independent of the other households. This is a necessary condition.
Fourth, The proportion of weeks that the trash is considered to be in an overload condition assumes that the probability of having an overload condition is constant and that the proportion of weeks in an overload condition (o) to the total number of weeks (w) being examined is o/w and equals p , which is the probability that M exceeds 27.070 lbs. (i.e. P(M>12.070) M-> N[26.830,12.780] )
Problem parameters given. µ= 26.830 σ= 12.780 r.v. is M (mean mass delivered in week to trash by each household)
Calculate P(M>27.070)
Since the problem specified that a standardized normal distribution (Z distribution) was to be used the formula for cumulative distribution of a standard normal distribution Φ(z) will be used.
Calculate Z z = (27.070-26.830)/12.780 or 0.01877934
Calculate Φ(0.01877934) = 0.5744807 (note: this is left tail)
Calculate P(z>0.01877934) = 1 - 0.5744807 or 0.4255193
Rounding to 4 decimal places = .4255
Alternatively this could have been done based on the average weekly load at the waste disposal site (132,460 lb mean and standard deviation of 898.0 lbs, overload = 133,644.6 lb) , but the results would still be the same.
The question of whether the situation requires action or if the system is overloaded too often is not a scientific question but a political one and which would require the consensus of the people being serviced as defined by those people placed in positions to represent them. The water and waste board might just as well say that since the system , on the average, is not overloaded, that things are ok. From an engineering standpoint it should be perfectly possible to construct a system where one could expect at least 2 sigma confidence (97.7% one sided confidence) So I would personally say:
No, this is not an acceptable level because it [should be] unusual for the system to be overloaded.