Cristian M. answered 07/08/20
MS Statistics Graduate with 5+ Years of Tutoring Experience
Cheesy Poofs. I love it.
So, let's name a random variable X to represent the number of ounces of Cheesy Poofs being poured into a box. When I write P(X>x) = ___, I mean that the probability of the amount of Poofs being poured into a box being greater than x ounces is...equal to something.
So, let's do some inverse operations. Your two-part question has percentages which need to turn back into raw measurements of amount of Poofs poured in a bag. On a TI-83 (and should be on TI-84 as well), this is done by the invNorm() function. Access it by going to DISTR (which is 2nd VARS) --> 3: invNorm( .
If you're on the TI-83 (which does not prompt for values to plug in), follow this order:
invNorm(probability, mean, standard_deviation).
For the first part, we need to find the amount of Poofs in half of the boxes. The "more than" language indicates that we need to study a part of our normal distribution, our curve, that covers a z-quartile of interest and beyond, not from the left-up (that works for a "less than" question).
Type: invNorm(1-0.5, 16.28, 0.4). This gives the upper 50% of boxes. This answers the question of
P(X > ??? ) = 0.5. We get 16.28.
50% of boxes of Cheesy Poofs produced actually contain more than 16.28 ounces.
For the second part, we're looking at P(X = ???) = 0.14. I need the highest 14% of boxes, since they will be the heaviest.
Type: invNorm(1-0.14, 16.28, 0.4). This gives the upper 14% of boxes. We get 16.71.
14% of boxes of Cheesy Poofs produced actually contain more than 16.71 ounces.
Please let me know if I can clarify anything, or if you need a way to solve this problem without technology.
Cristian M.
07/08/20
Katherine C.
how would I be able to solve the second part without a calculator?07/08/20