Hello Diana,
You wish to carry out a hypothesis test involving a population proportion (designated p) at a significance level α = .05. Here, p is the proportion of correctly identified fingerprints. From the alternative hypothesis H1, we note that this is a one-tail test (to the right.) The appropriate test statistic is given by
z = (P - p)/√(pq/n),
where
n = sample size
p = population proportion
q = 1 - p
P = sample proportion
[Note that I am using an upper-case p to distinguish the sample proportion from the population proportion.]
To carry out the test, we use the value of the population proportion assumed in the null hypothesis. That is,
p = .87
and thus,
q = 1 - .87 = .13
Note that using these values for p and q (and under the assumption that Ho is true), the distribution of the test statistic is (approximately) equal to the standard normal distribution.
Also, from the given data, n = 459
and
P = "number of successes"/n = 404/459 ≅ .88017
Now we may calculate the observed value of the test statistic
z = (.88017 - .87)/√(.87·.13/459)
z ≅ .6479
z ≅ .65
Next, we determine the p-value. Since the test is a one-tail test to the right, the p-value is the probability that the test statistic Z is greater than the calculated (observed) value of the test statistic. That is
p-value = Prob[Z>.65]
This is the area under the standard normal distribution to the right of .65. From a table of the standard normal distribution, we find that the area to the left of .65 is .7422, so
p-value = 1 - .7422 = .2578
When using the p-value method, Ho is rejected if and only if the p-value is less than the significance level α. In our case, however, the p-value is clearly greater than the significance level of .05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Since we fail to reject Ho, this means that we do not have statistically significant evidence in support of H1. Therefore, we can express our final conclusion as:
D) There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the accuracy rate for fingerprint identification is more than 0.87.
Let me know if you need any further explanation.
William
Diana D.
Thank you william!08/21/19