Intuitively, when we're calculating the sample variance, it's because we don't know the population variance--or the population mean. When we calculate the sample variance, we're using the sample mean, but that is ITSELF an estimate, because the true population mean is unknown.
So we're estimating the dispersion about a mean that is itself an estimate. This means our estimate is more uncertain (there is more variation) than there otherwise would be. Bessel's correction, intuitively, takes this into account by decrementing the denominator by 1 (representing the loss of 1 degree of freedom), which makes the fraction larger, and correctly reflects the greater uncertainty associated with estimating a parameter based on another parameter that is itself unknown.