
Patrick B. answered 05/29/19
Math and computer tutor/teacher
The diagonals of the square bisect it's angles and each other.
M is the intersection of PQ and diagonal AC
THEN angles DAP = CAQ = t and angles PAM and QAB = 45-t, since the corner angles are 45 each.
Let angle AQB = x, AQM = z, AMQ = lambda, AMP = alpha, APQ = w, and APD = y.
We wish to prove that x=z and y=w, and such shall be done by contradiction, by supposing that x and z are distinct angles, as are y and w.
Per triangle AQM, t + z + lambda = 180
Per triangle AMP w + alpha - t = 135
then w + z + alpha + lambda = 315.
However, w + z + alpha + lambda = 135 per triangle APQ .
This contradiction proves that the original assumption is false.
Specifically , it is NOT true that neither pair of angles are unequal.
Therefore, one pair of angles must be equal.
Without loss of generality (WLOG), Repeating this argument for angles ADP = APM = y, also produces
the same contradiction which forces the other pair of angles to be equal.
(You get a system of 5 unknown and 5 equations which produces the contradiction, upon solution, that
2w + lamba = 135 = 45).
Therefore, BOTH pairs of angles as stated must be equal to each other.
As before, ADP = APM = y, with angles AQB = AQM = x.
There are now 5 unknowns: t,x,w,lamba, and y
y + t = 90 from triangle ADP
y + lambda - t = 225
t + w +x = 180 per triangle AMQ
x-t = 45 per triangle ABQ
Per quadrilateral AQPD, x + t + 2y = 225
solves the first equation for t , gives t = 90-y.
BUT, by quadrilateral ABQP
45 + t + 90 +2x + y = 360
135 + 2x + t+ y = 360
2x + t + y = 225
2x + (90- y) + y = 225
2x + 90 = 225
2x = 135
x = 67.5
which forces t=22.5
which forces w = 90
which forces lambda = 90
which forces y = 67.5
Therefore x=y = 67.5
which concludes the proof
[end of proof]