
Derek V. answered 03/27/19
Philosophy Professor with 5 years of Teaching Experience
I do think that, if you find a religious text authoritative, it would be easier in some cases to "determine" what one should or shouldn't do. If you're wondering whether it's wrong to do X, and you think religious text T has an answer and that it's the right answer, then all you have to do is to see what T has to say about it.
However, just because it's true that, in some cases, it's easier to get what you'd think is the right answer about a moral question if you have a text that you think has the right answer, it doesn't follow that "without the moral center of a religious text, true ethics [is] impossible." It seems to me that Aristotle did some really good ethics, but none of his ethical principles are derived from a religious text that he found authoritative. (He did talk about "the gods" as if he believed in them, and he does argue for a prime-mover of the universe, and so in some sense I think it would be a mistake to think of Aristotle as an out-right atheist. But this does not affect my point: regardless of Aristotle's religious leanings, his ethical thought is both powerful and plausible, and his ethical thought does not rely on any religious text that he takes to be authoritative.)