I think there's a typo on the second estimator. I think that should be (X1+Xn)/2. If estimator 2 is just X1+Xn, then it's not an estimator since it does not have the same support as the parameter space. :-)
Anyway, we can evaluate estimators of the mean using the following criteria: unbiasedness, and minimum variance.
[ In statistics, there's a lot of other criteria such as consistency, efficiency,robustness, resitance, etc.]
unbiasedness: E(estimator) = target parameter
1. E(X1) = μ
2. E[(X1+Xn)/2]= (1/2)*[E(X1)+E(Xn)] = (1/2) (μ + μ) = μ
3. E[(X1+X2+...+Xn)/n] =(1/n)*[μ + μ + ... + μ] = (1/n)* n*μ = μ
Variance:
1. Var(X1) =σ2
2. Var[(X1+Xn)/2) =(1/4)* [σ2+σ2) = σ2/2
1. Var[(X1+X2+...+Xn)/n) = (1/n2)*(σ2 + σ2 + ... + σ2) = (1/n2)*(nσ2) = σ2/n
Note that all of the 3 estimators are unbiased but the 3rd estimator, sample mean, gives the smallest variance, which makes it the "best" among the 3.
DEL R.
07/19/17