Naina B. answered 12/06/13
Tutor
4.8
(155)
Naina, a versatile tutor
Hi Saori,
Answer C is correct in terms of geological and scientific fact. However, the question is about the scientific explanation of unusually high concentration of iron in the boundary clay. Statement in D provides that answer but statement does not. Therefore, although statement C is a correct scientific fact yet it is not the correct answer to question.
Answer A is not correct as paragraph does not talk about cretaceous period.
Answer B is not correct either since paragraph does not include information about measurement of iron so many million years ago.
Hope this helps.

Naina B.
Thank you so much William, now I recall it. I just assumed Saori typed Ir instead of Iron.
Report
12/06/13
Saori T.
Thank you, Naina and William!!
I read the website, and I though was actually surprised from the article.
And, the hypothesis are changing over time.
Thank you for your help!!
Report
12/08/13
William S.
Ir is iridium, not iron. Iron is Fe. And the statement C is not a correct scientific fact. The correct answer is D, but not for reasons you might suspect. You remember, Saori, how I told you about that asteroid impact that was instrumental in killing off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago? Well the proof that such an impact occurred is based on the unusually high concentration of Ir in a clay layer deposited at that same time! This discovery was made by Luis and Walter Alvarez.
12/06/13