Elena K.

asked • 02/26/16

Problem 13.3.2 from Prealgebra by AoPS: please help!

Each man in the Not Much Hair Left club counts the number of hairs remaining on his head. They represent their results with the stem-and-leaf plot shown (here're the values from the stem-and-leaf plot: 1, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 12, 12, 14, 23, 29, 40, 45, 56, 58, 75, 76, 79). Upon checking the table a second time, the club finds that one digit in the stem-and-leaf table is incorrect. When the number is fixed, the average number of hairs on each head is correctly computed as 26.75. Which number in the table is incorrect, and what should it have been?

Could you please help us with this problem? Here's our thinking: After the number is fixed, the average number of hairs on a head is 26.75, so, given that the total number of men is 20, they have a total of 535 hairs combined, as opposed to the total number of hairs equal 565 they had before the mistakes was discovered. That means that one man's number of hairs decreased by 30 after the mistake was discovered. Therefore, any two-digit number that starts with 4, 5 or 7 could have been changed to a number that is 30 less. What we don't understand is how is it possible to figure out which one specific number it is? Where did we go wrong in our thinking? Thanks so much in advance, Elena ;-)

1 Expert Answer

By:

Kenneth S. answered • 02/26/16

Tutor
4.8 (62)

Expert Help in Algebra/Trig/(Pre)calculus to Guarantee Success in 2018

Elena K.

Kenneth, thanks so much for helping us! I'm still wondering though why wouldn't any number from the stem-and-leaf plot do. For example, suppose 79 were incorrect, then in the stem-and-leaf plot we'd just love 9 to the 4 tens row, right? If it's 49 instead of 79, that would give us the right average, right? Wouldn't 79 also qualify as a one digit mistake? Or why couldn't it be 76 (which would mean that the 6 would move to the 4 tens row in the stem-and-leaf plot). Can't seem to wrap my mind around it... Elena
Report

02/26/16

Kenneth S.

I liked 74 (changing to 45) because there already was a 45 in the table.
But 40 changed to 10 also works (& there's already a 10 in the table). 
 
Either of these would effect the minimum change in the table's LEAF part, by not introducing a leaf number that was not already there.  (This is my interpretation of the "one digit in the stem-and-leaf table is incorrect.)
 
For any others that COULD be reduced by 30, the reduced result would not duplicate a number already in the table.
 
Quite an interesting problem; as so often is the case, it comes down to a question of semantics.
 
 
Report

02/26/16

Ravi B.

Sorry for the late response; I just saw the question.  First, let's recall what the stem-and-leaf plot originally looked like:
 
0 | 1 1 3 5 6 8
1 | 0 2 2 2 4
2 | 3 9
4 | 0 5
5 | 6 8
7 | 5 6 9
 
  Elena, as you pointed out, we need a reduction of 30.  We can change only one digit in the table.  We can change the tens digit 7 to a 6 (not 4), which reduces the three entries on 7's row by 10 each, for a total reduction of 30.  The 7's row is the only row with either 1 or 3 entries, so that's the only change that works.   
 
  P.S.  I'm a co-author of the book.  Elena, do you have our solutions manual?
 
Report

05/15/16

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.