We can solve this problem by applying basic orbital mechanics principles, specifically using Kepler’s Third Law (as you mentioned) and Newton’s Law of Gravitation.
Step 1: Calculate the Semi-Major Axis (a)
Using Kepler’s Third Law and Newton's Gravity:
T^2 = (4 * π^2 * a^3) / (G * (M1 + M2))
where:
- T is the orbital period (80days converted to 6.91e6 seconds)
- M1/M2 is the mass of each object (the total being 3 solar masses)
- G is the gravitational constant
- a is the semi-major axis of rotation (or the distance between the two bodies)
We can solve the above for a, giving us a number for our semi-major axis. Now we can calculate the mass of an object using the fact the motion is circular.
Step 2: Calculate the Mass of Object 1 (M1)
For a circular orbit, the velocity of object 2 can be related to the mass of object 1:
v2 = √(GM1/a)
Because we know v2 is 40km/s (which we should convert to 4e4m/s), we can solve the above for M1
Step 3: Determine the other Mass
We know that the Mtotal = M1 + M2 = 3 solar masses
Rearranging the equation M2 = 3solarmasses - M1
When I calculate this (I attached some python code below) I get M1≈.95 solar masses and M2≈2.05 solar masses.
Now, to answer your original question of which object is the pulsar: Based on the data we have, and without additional specific observations, we can make an educated guess. Pulsars are generally more massive than white dwarfs, and since object 2 has more than twice the mass of object 1, it’s highly likely that object 2 is the pulsar.
However, there is some room for uncertainty. The masses of pulsars and white dwarfs can sometimes overlap depending on the specific systems, and without more detailed information—such as pulse timing data or spectral analysis—this conclusion isn’t absolutely certain. But, given typical mass ranges, object 2 is the most probable candidate for the pulsar.

Jacob B.
10/24/24
Percy H.
Thank you very much! I understand it now11/11/24
Percy H.
Thank you so much for your help. May I ask why we can relate the velocity of object 2 to the mass of object 1? Would we not use v2 to calculate M2 instead?10/24/24