John Stuart Mill and other utilitarian philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham, who invented the Greatest Happiness Principle, believed that happiness was a major factor in morality. The Greatest Happiness Principle reflects this, as any action that promotes happiness is seen as good and moral. Any action that promotes the opposite of happiness, pain, is seen as immoral and bad. Mill believed that happiness was "Pleasure with the absence of pain." This is an adequate definition of happiness because one cannot be happy and feel the antithesis of happiness, which is suffering and pain, at once.
Antonio T.
asked 03/10/242 Philosophy Questions
- State J.S Mill’s “ Greatest Happiness Principle”. Is his definition of happiness an adequate one?
- What is the concept of the “impartial spectator?” Do you think that all of our moral reasoning should take into consideration the good of the whole? Do people tend to act as disinterested spectators or more sel-interested?
Follow
1
Add comment
More
Report
1 Expert Answer
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Ask a question for free
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Find an Online Tutor Now
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.