
Anthony T. answered 03/07/24
Patient Science Tutor
I basically followed the procedure you used but got a different result. Here are my steps.
Moles of CO2 at equilibrium = 1.8 – X where X is moles CO2 reacted.
Moles of CO at equilibrium = 2X
Grams of CO2 at equil. = (1.8 – X) x 44
Grams of CO at equil. = 2X(28)
Total grams of gases at equil. = 16.9 g/L x 5 = 84.5 g
Solve (1.8 – X) x 44 + 2X (28) = 84.5 for X
X= 0.44 moles CO2 reacted
Moles of CO2 at equil. = (1.8 – 0.44) = 1.79 moles
Moles of CO at equil = 2 x X = 0.88 moles
Pco2 = 1.79 moles x 0.082 Latm/mol° x 1100K / 5L = 32.3 atm
Pco = 0.88 x 0.082 x 1100 / 5 = 15.9
Kp = 15.9^2 / 32.3 = 7.8
Check my math and let me know if this answer is correct. Thanks.

Anthony T.
You are correct! I made a mistake. You can make that correction and fix the rest of the calculations.03/08/24

Anthony T.
I now got 10.3 atm. This is essentially what you got.03/08/24
Constantine S.
What do you think could be made different? I am glad that you got what I got so now I don't feel as crazy, but somehow this isn't the right answer...03/08/24

Anthony T.
Post the question again to see if anyone else comes up with something different. What we did seems logical. I was unsure about the dry ice but thought that at 1100K, it would be all gas. Maybe this assumption is incorrect. What if we don't consider the 79.2g and solve the problem by only considering he final conditions where X = the moles of CO2 present at equilibrium and 2X the moles of CO. The equation would then be 44X + 56X = 84.5, X = 0.845. Doing the rest of the problem as before then gives a Kp of 60.8. Does this make sense?03/08/24
Constantine S.
So I just talked to my professor, and the correct answer is 9.41, which she can't derive either. We're both getting the same answer she's getting. Very interesting. Not sure what the website did different, but thanks for your time and let me know if you have any clue where 9.4 would come from :)03/08/24

Anthony T.
I found this problem on the web at (https://www.pearson.com/channels/general-chemistry/asset/ab5fc34f/a-79-2-g-chunk-of-dry-ice-solid-co2-and-30-0-g-of-graphite-carbon-were-placed-in). However, the video solution presented was of a similar but not identical problem.03/09/24
Constantine S.
Mr. Anthony, thank you so much for your response! How did you get 1.79 moles from subtracting 0.44 from 1.8? Here I got 1.36.03/08/24