Electrons in different orbitals may overlap without transitioning between, because electron orbitals are somewhat diffuse things. If we could "interrogate" a particular electron, we might "find" it at various places, at different times. But its quantum state, NOT its instantaneous position, is What It Is. So, many different electrons COULD simultaneously be in a particular place around an atom, BUT that is only possible because they have different quantum number sets, and are acting like waves (which, after all, can pass right through each other on the surface of the water). The electrons simply ignore each other!
There is a qualification to the idea that electron clouds are big puffy things all the way around an atom. And that is, that higher orbitals and suborbitals have NODES in their clouds -- places (spherical or radial shapes) where the electron will NEVER be found, BUT the electon exists simultaneously on both sides of that gap! That's a property of a standing or travelling wave on the water, too -- it exists on both sides of a node!
Now, that's not the case for "free electrons", namely, those not on an atom. Those repel each other fiercely, by electrostatic force.
With respect to your followup question to Jacques D. above, there are several sorts of modification to the energies you usually observe for various orbitals and suborbitals, that give the general organization to the Periodic Table. One big one is that a half-filled suborbital (such as 3d5) is more stable than the 3d4 and 3d6 on either "side" of it, so it will "borrow" a 4s electron to fill itself, for atomic manganese (or any ion with the same number of total electrons). The same goes for a completely-filled suborbital, so for Zn atom, it fills the 3d10, and then loses BOTH 4s electrons to form a Zn(2+) ion, for example.
-- Cheers, --Mr. d.
Falak G.
Thank you for your answer. With transition metals, do 4s and 3d orbitals "switch back" to their former energy levels after the 3d orbital has completely been filled or do they stay where they are with 3d at a higher energy level? (I was under the impression that the 3d orbital is already at a higher energy level than 4s, because of the way electrons populate the two subshells, but you mentioned that.. it switches with 4s as it starts accepting electrons...) Also, since 3d has higher energy, is it farther away from the nucleus than 4s?01/13/23