Political Lens and the Notion of Sovereignty

Question

The political lens and the notion of sovereignty and borders is a hot topic in the discourse surrounding globalization in the modern world. How do you define borders and what elements of the political lens can be used to better grasp the inner workings of large international organizations? Thoughts on the war against Ukraine?

Answer 1

Hi Cody! 

To thoroughly answer your question, let’s break down a few of the concepts you’ve introduced. Next, we can tie them all together based on their common denominator– globalization. 

Borders can best be defined as political boundaries that separate geographical areas, governing who and what has control over these areas. In relation to “political lenses”, it’s important to realize that this can refer to a wide range of things: policies, political discourse, the relationship between those who determine political outcomes and those who do not, and the social and historical factors that shape all of the things we just mentioned. As a result, borders are inevitably characterized by said political lenses. 

By “the inner workings of large international organizations”, I will assume you’re referring to how these organizations, which are composed of varying countries, approach globalization. I think, when trying to understand these “inner workings”, it helps to liken them to relationships. In doing so, you can pay attention to the policies that govern these relationships, and how they translate to the political boundaries established and/or discussed by and within these countries. 

To answer your question about Ukraine, I will use it as an example of how this war has affected globalization. Let’s create a very realistic scenario: Cyprus relies heavily on Russia for certain goods, but disapproves of its attack on Ukraine, and has mobilized with other countries to protect Ukraine. We can imagine what this would mean for Cyprus’ relationship with Russia, and as a result, with countries that have probably chosen to align themselves with Russia. These relationships would be strained. 

I hope this helps! I would suggest looking at the various countries within international organizations, and the policies that characterize them. Think critically about why they have come together, what countries work closely together, what countries have opted out? What countries have "more authority" over others and why? Examining the European Union is a great way to analyze this phenomenon, and how globalization works in the modern world. 

Best,

Irima