Michael S. answered 13d
B.S. in Chemistry, Indiana University; Organic Chem Teaching Intern
Work the titration first, then read what the numbers are telling you — because this data set has something instructive hiding in it.
Step 1 — titrant delivered
17.29 − 0.53 = 16.76 mL of 0.0106 M KIO3
mol IO3− = (0.01676 L)(0.0106 M) = 1.777 × 10−4 mol
Step 2 — the stoichiometry (this is the part that decides everything)
The iodate does not touch the vitamin C directly. With excess KI and HCl it first generates iodine:
IO3− + 5 I− + 6 H+ → 3 I2 + 3 H2O
and the iodine is what oxidises the ascorbic acid, 1:1:
C6H8O6 + I2 → C6H6O6 + 2 I− + 2 H+
So 1 mol IO3− ≡ 3 mol ascorbic acid. (Electron check: iodate goes I+5 → I−1, a 6-electron reduction; ascorbic acid gives up 2 electrons. 6/2 = 3 ✓.)
mol ascorbic acid in the 20.00 mL aliquot = 3(1.777 × 10−4) = 5.330 × 10−4 mol
Step 3 — scale the aliquot up to the whole flask
The aliquot is 20.00 of 100.00 mL, so multiply by 5:
mol ascorbic acid in the flask = 2.665 × 10−3 mol
Step 4 — and here is the catch
Molar mass = mass ÷ moles requires the mass of pure ascorbic acid. If you use the 1.552 g of powder:
M = 1.552 g / 2.665 × 10−3 mol = 582 g/mol
Ascorbic acid is C6H8O6, molar mass 176.12 g/mol. Your result is 3.3× too high — and that is not an arithmetic error. A vitamin C tablet is not pure ascorbic acid. Most of that 1.552 g is binder, filler, and coating.
So this experiment cannot determine the molar mass; it determines how much vitamin C is present. If your assignment really asks for molar mass, it is likely a wording slip — worth raising with your instructor.
What the data actually gives you
mass of ascorbic acid = (2.665 × 10−3 mol)(176.12 g/mol) = 0.469 g in the 1.552 g of powder → 30.2% ascorbic acid by mass
Scaling to the whole 1.634 g tablet:
0.469 g × (1.634 / 1.552) = 0.494 g ≈ 494 mg per tablet
That is a 500 mg vitamin C tablet, recovered to within 1.2%. Landing that close on a labelled value is strong evidence the titration, the 3:1 stoichiometry, and the aliquot scaling are all correct — which is exactly the confirmation the 582 g/mol figure could never give you.
Why the tablet was weighed twice: 1.634 g is the whole tablet, 1.552 g is what actually made it into the flask. Some powder is always lost in transfer, so the final scale-up by 1.634/1.552 is what converts your measured quantity back to a per-tablet basis. Skipping it under-reports the tablet by about 5%.