0825 2.

asked • 12/28/21

CHEMISTRY DOUBT - Why did Rutherford think the atom was empty?


Why did Rutherford think the atom was empty? It could be possible that the alpha particles went through the weak field of the positively charged particles due to the heavy mass and fast speed of the alpha particles.. So we could conclude that the atom is having dense accumulation of positively charged particles at the centre, and weak around it.. Also How did Rutherford know where the electrons could be present, as the electrons don't affect the alpha particles due to their extremely light masses, so the scattering of the alpha particles doesn't depend on the electrons..?


PLEASE ANSWER...

1 Expert Answer

By:

0825 2.

Yes I do know about this, but HOW did he know that the atom was empty? I know the alpha particles went straight ahead, but the atom could also have low electric field positively charged particles and the alpha particles could easily push through them, so how could he come to the conclusion that the atom was mostly empty?
Report

12/28/21

Robert S.

tutor
Oh, sorry. I now understand. Most, but not all of the alpha particles struck the detector on the opposite side. The fact that a few bounced back was the shock. He concluded that there must be one area in an atom that was very dense, but that, since most went through, the atom was mostly empty in the other regions outside the nucleus. This reflects the difference in densities between the nucleus and the atom as a whole. The electron cloud does indeed form a shell consisting of most of the atom's volume, but it's density must be very low. The electrons form a shell that is mostly empty of other matter, which is what led Rutherford to conclude that whatever was there, it contained very little matter.
Report

12/28/21

0825 2.

ok thanks a lot 😃😃
Report

12/28/21

0825 2.

so he said that the area outside the nucleus was less dense and contained less matter as compared to the nucleus right
Report

12/28/21

Robert S.

tutor
Yes. A lot less dense, so the atom "must be mostly empty space."
Report

12/28/21

0825 2.

great, thanks a lot sir, I was not able to find the answer anywhere, you were of great help 😊
Report

12/28/21

Robert S.

tutor
You are welcome. I remember having basically the same question many years ago. In Rutherford's time, a lot was still unknown about the atom. That's why he was surprised with his grad student's result. He worried something was wrong with the experiment. But it was replicated, and he was forced to surmise that most of an atom didn't have enough structure to repel alpha particles. It is a good example of scientific method: If the Plum Pudding model theory is correct, the particles should not bounce back. But, to everyone's surprise, they did bounce back. So a new explanation was developed.
Report

12/28/21

0825 2.

👍🏻
Report

12/29/21

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.