Michael S. answered 14d
B.S. in Chemistry, Indiana University; Organic Chem Teaching Intern
(f) 231 g of L. Parts (d) and (e) are Nernst-equation reasoning, and the two observations together actually tell you which way the cell runs — that is the nice part of this problem.
First, deduce the cell reaction from part (e)
E = E° − (0.0592/n) log Q. Voltage rises when Q falls.
Adding water dilutes both half-cells by the same factor f (here 100/120 = 0.833). Watch what that does to Q depending on direction:
If the reaction were R(s) + 2L+ → R2+ + 2L(s), then Q = [R2+]/[L+]2 and dilution gives Qnew = Q/f — Q increases, so voltage would drop.
If instead 2L(s) + R2+ → 2L+ + R(s), then Q = [L+]2/[R2+] and dilution gives Qnew = f·Q — Q decreases, so voltage rises.
You were told the voltage rises, so the second direction is the correct one: L is oxidised at the anode, R2+ is reduced at the cathode.
(e) Why dilution raises the voltage
The cell reaction produces two moles of dissolved ions (2 L+) for every one it consumes (R2+). Diluting shifts an equilibrium toward the side with more dissolved particles, so it favours the forward reaction and pushes E up.
Quantitatively: Q goes from 1.00 to 0.833, log Q = −0.079, and E rises by (0.0296)(0.079) = about 2 mV. A real increase, but a small one — which is what you should expect from a modest dilution.
(d) Why adding NaCl raises the voltage
The Na+ is a spectator; the Cl− is what matters. Chloride precipitates L+ as insoluble LCl, the way Cl− does with Ag+, Pb2+, and Hg22+.
That removes L+ from solution — and L+ is a product of the cell reaction. Removing a product lowers Q and raises E, exactly as Le Châtelier predicts: the cell responds by driving the forward reaction harder.
(If chloride had instead precipitated R2+, a reactant, the voltage would have fallen. The direction of the observed change is what tells you which ion the chloride grabbed.)
(f) Electrolysis calculation
Charge passed: Q = It = (11.4 A)(8.1 h)(3600 s/h) = 3.324 × 105 C
Moles of electrons: 3.324 × 105 / 96 485 C/mol = 3.445 mol e−
From the formula LNO3, nitrate is 1−, so L is L+ and the reduction is L+ + e− → L — one electron per atom.
m = (3.445 mol)(67.1 g/mol) = 231 g of L
The step people miss is the charge on L. Reading it off the nitrate formula is the reliable way — if L had been L2+, the answer would be half this.