Cameron B. answered 12/24/20
Philosopher of Science with Machine Learning Experience.
Sorry, but I don't think the other answer has answered what is being asked. Roughly, the distinction is as follows:
Absolute space means that there is an absolute coordinate system (like 3D Euclidean space) or frame of reference. Objects (planets, billiard balls, etc.) exist in that space with an absolute position determined by the (absolute) coordinate system. Traditional historical arguments (Newton) might invoke God as an omni-present being across the universe as determining the absolute frame of reference for which all matter and bodies in the universe exist (and so we can define the physics with respect to that absolute frame of reference).
Relational space says that there is no absolute frame of reference, and that the motion of bodies (for example) is only defined with respect to the rest of the bodies. You might draw this historical line of thought roughly from Leibniz to Mach's principle and Einstein. Einstein's relativity, for example, rejected the notion of absolute simultaneity. What might appear as simultaneous events in one frame of reference will not be simultaneous in another frame of reference.
For more details and history on the topic, I suggest starting with the following Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-theories/
Cameron B.
Hi Michael, I don't think there is just one answer to the question "what is space?". Or, there isn't a simple answer. You could classically say it is empty or a vacuum in-between massive bodies. If you read the SEP article, they also mention substantivalism---i.e. the claim that space is a substance in itself. Or you might have a more modern answer which gets into relativistic spacetimes, quantum field theory, or zero-point energy. There are philosophical, conceptual, as well as mathematical (e.g. Euclidean vs non-Euclidean geometries) involved in answering that question.12/26/20
Michael L.
I did read some of the article but I didn't understand much of the terminology.12/26/20
Michael L.
I am also interested in what your conception of space is.12/26/20
Cameron B.
Michael, at this point I think your interests would be best served by more intensive study of the foundations so that you are more familiar with the terminology and concepts used in articles like that. I'm not sure what your background or education level is, but if you are very interested in the philosophy and foundations of physics I can recommend going through Cushing's book Philosophical Concepts in Physics. Ideally, with a suitable tutor.12/26/20
Michael L.
Ok.01/11/21
Michael L.
Hello Cameron, thank you for your response. You've outlined the absolutist and relationist conceptions of space but you haven't defined space.12/25/20