Hi, Jan,
None of the options provide conclusive proof that a chemical change occurred, in my opinion. But the question reads "Which of the following identifies the best way to gather evidence to support the type of change that occurred . . .". So let's approach it by trying to decide what it might be, before choosing what else we could use to bolster our thinking.
We have a few facts:
- X has physical properties consistent with those of a salt, such as high melting temperature and crystalline, white appearance.
- When added to water, water's boiling point rises, suggesting dissolution (water soluble) of an ionic compound.
- X is compatible with water, but we don't know whether it is simply dispersed (emulsion) or dissolved. Since the solution is clear, it would appear to be dissolved.
Our hypothesis at this point is that X is an inorganic salt. Inorganic, since it has a high melting point. But we'd like more evidence. Option D allows us to check the conductivity of the samples. YES, I say. Gimme a conductivity meter and I'll use that to bolster my hypothesis that X is an inorganic salt. It would dissolve, provide a clear solution with water, and elevate water's boiling point.
I would normally choose "Read the label on the bottle of X," but that option was left off the list. Darn.
Bob