this is part of my review.i just want to see if i have the correct answers. please help!!!

Question

33) For Kant, it is possible to evaluate morality in general based on which of the following. Select all that apply:

A)   Consequences of actions.

B)   None of the above.

C)   Whether or not it leads to happiness.

D)   Certain actions.

34 > A central concept in Kant's ethics is the test to determine whether a maxim is a universal moral law. The test is one of universalizability, which means:

A)   When dealing with others, we must treat them the same that is, treat them universally

B)   It must apply to all rational beings, at all times, in all cultures, for all races and all genders

C)   It's ones's duty to maximize the happiness of all

D)   All people must agree to it, like forming a contract

36> The set of traditional principles that are widely shared within a culture or society, like those of the law and etiquette, which are the result of human decisions, agreements and pracetice, is known as

A) Relativism

B) Conventional morally

C) Egoism

D) Hedonism.

37> ________ is the view that there is one ultimate moral duty -- to improve your own well-being as best you can

A) Ethical egoism

B) Psychological egoism

C) Hedoism

D) subjectivism

38> which of the following thinkers is primarily associated with hedoism?

A) Epicurus

B) Epictetus

C) seneca

D) Mill

Answer 1

Good except for the Kant answers. Kant is not a consequentialist. He does not care one iota about consequences of actions or maximizing happiness. Morality is grounded in reason for Kant, and it is simply by thinking about morality and persons that we can derive the fundamental moral machinery (the categorical imperative) through which we can test any putative moral principle. Actions are either right or wrong in themselves, based on whether the principle underlying them survives the moral machinery (e.g. being self-contradictory). We cannot lie because if we made that a universal law (applying to everyone everywhere and always), then it would undermine itself. Hence, lying is self-contradictory and so morally wrong.

Hopefully the clues here suggest which answers need to be changed and to what.