f(x) = x^5 from x = 0 to x = 2
(a) Okay, I'm going to first explain once again the formula in general for you, if you feel like you already know this, read below the dotted line.
So, the first thing that you have to understand is that the formula that you wrote above for area is just saying to add up a bunch of rectangles. When you read: f(x1)Δx1 <------this is the area of one rectangle (specifically the first rectangle you drew.) Here f(x1) represents the height of the rectangle and Δx1 represents the width of the rectangle. Now to make the math simple, we assume that each rectangle has the same width, that means Δx1 = Δx2 = ... = Δxn, and since each width is the same, you can easily figure out how big the width is with the formula Δx = (b-a)/n where a, and b are the interval you are interested in, so in this case a = 0 and b = 2, and n is the number of rectangles that you are going to create. Think about it for a while, does that formula make sense? If you want to make 10 rectangles and your interval length is 2 (b/c 2 - 0) wouldn't you just divide the length of the interval by 10 making each width 2/10 or 1/5?
Therefore, each of our Δx = (2 - 0)/n = 2/n (don't worry too much about not knowing what n is right now, just keep in mind that n is the number of rectangles you'll make, and it can represent any number you want - for now we'll just keep it as n) Make sure that part makes sense first.
Okay, now the heights can get a bit tricky and it'd be easier if I could draw for you, but I'll try my best to explain.
If you drew the graph of f(x) = x^5 on the interval [0,2], and you decided to cut the graph with 10 rectangles. First your width of each rectangle would be 1/5 (since Δx = (2 - 0)/10 = 2/10 = 1/5) If you drew in your rectangles, can you see that your rectangles height's are dictated by the y - values of the graph? In other words the height of your rectangle will touch the graph of x^5 itself. So, one of the heights would be f(1/5) = (1/5)^5 another would be at f(2/5) = (2/5)^5 another would be at f(3/5) = (3/5)^5, etc until you reach your last rectangle. I recommend drawing this out so you can see this. Label your x - axes with 0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, ..., 9/5, 10/5. Draw in 10 rectangles and can you see how the heights of the rectangles are at the y - values of the x - values we just labeled? If you can understand this, then move on...
So, if you cut up n rectangles, you'll have a width of Δx = 2/n (as explained above), and we'll call each x - value: 0, x1, x2, x3, x4, ..., xn. (Here xn lands on 2, but I'll just call it xn just to keep everything consistent).
Now the first rectangle's area will be f(x1)Δx (where Δx is the width of the first rectangle, and f(x1) is the height of the same rectangle. As we know area = height * width.)
The second rectangle has an area of f(x2)Δx (same reason as above)
The third rectangle has an area of f(x3)Δx
The fourth f(x4)Δx....get the idea? All the way up to the last rectangle which will have area f(xn)Δxn
Thus the total area of all the rectangles added up is:
f(x1)Δx + f(x2)Δx + f(x3)Δx + f(x4)Δx + ... + f(xn)Δx
Now, since all the Δx's are the same (i.e. 2/n) I can factor out the Δx and I'd have:
[ f(x1) + f(x2) + f(x3) + f(x4) + ... + f(xn) ]Δx
Which using summation notation, I can write as:
n
Σ f(xi) Δx <-----This is just shorthand for what you see in the previous line above.
i=1
Now, because you want to know the exact area under the curve, you need more rectangles. Thus n→∞.
So, n
Area = lim ∑ f(xi)Δx <------ Do you see how this just says add up a whole crap ton of rectangles?
n→∞ i = 1
---------
So, for your part (a) remember your x - values are 0, 2/n, 4/n, 6/n, ..., 2n/n. So, x1 = 2/n; x2 = 4/n; x3 = 6/n, etc.
In other words xi = (2i)/n
f(xi)=f(2i/n) = (2i/n)5 , and as explained above Δx = 2/n (b/c (2 - 0)/n = 2/n)
Putting this into our formula:
n
Area = lim ∑ (2i/n)5(2/n)
n→∞ i = 1
Expanding this out, we get:
lim [(2/n)5(2/n) + (4/n)5(2/n) + (6/n)5(2/n) +(8/n)5(2/n) + .... + (2n/n)5 (2/n)]
n→∞
(b) Now, starting with the line above
lim [(2/n)5(2/n) + (4/n)5(2/n) + (6/n)5(2/n) + (8/n)5(2/n) + .... + (2n/n)5 (2/n)]
n→∞
As before, notice how you can factor out the 2/n
lim 2/n [(2/n)5 + (4/n)5 + (6/n)5 + (8/n)5 + .... + (2n/n)5]
n→∞
Do you notice that we can factor out a 25/n5 as well, since
(2/n)5 + (4/n)5 + (6/n)5 + (8/n)5 + .... + (2n/n)5
=(2/n)5 + (2(2)/n)5 + (2(3)/n)5 + (2(4)/n)5 + .... + (2(n)/n)5
=25/n5(15 + 25 + 35 + 45 + ... + n5)
Using your formula given in the problem, we can write
lim 2/n {25/n5(15 + 25 + 35 + 45 + ... + n5)}
n→∞
lim 26/n6 [n2(n+1)2(2n2 + 2n - 1)/12] <------This replaced 15 + 25 + 35 + 45 + ... + n5
n→∞
Finally, notice that since the numerator has a leading coefficient of 2n6 (in the brackets - once everything is factored out) and the denominator has a power of 12n6, we know that
lim 26(2n6 + .... )/12n6 = 26(2)/12 (since the highest power on top and bottom are both the same powers)
n→∞
Hence the area = 27 /12= 128/12 = 32/3
Sorry, this was super long, but I felt that if you understood where the formula comes from, it'll help with other problems as well. Hope this helps.
Mr. K