Marshall W. answered 08/20/19
Supposing causation entails that events are separate, which is unnecessary in consideration of the universe's existence. If the universe is part of existence, which it apparently is, then the supposition of causation is incoherent. Also, the classical definition of "god" is an anthropomorphic being with supernatural abilities, which seems like a fiction that an anthropocentric being would invent. The universe may very well be intelligent, and even have a personality, but that would not entail much in the way of human-like qualities. Also, existence itself, outside of the case of anomalies, such as carbon-based lifeforms, may be perfectly stupid and impersonal. Here's the crux of the matter: if you don't have proof, then you don't need to believe.