Eric T. S.

asked • 02/26/18

Integration by parts

Hi,

I am studying a physics text and I came across a derivation that I cannot reproduce myself.
It involves the INT[(v^2.exp(-alpha.v^2).dv] with integration limits between zero and infinity.
This is one of the socalled Gaussian integrals.Here alpha is a constant and v is a velocity.
In the text(Principles of Modern Physics by A.P.French),this integral is initially treated by
integration by parts

They say that it is equal to:[-(v.exp(-alpha. v^2)/2.alpha] + ( 1/(2.alpha).INT[(exp(-alpha.v^2).dv] ( Integral between zero and infinity again)
When I do this ,I agree with this calculation,except that I find that in the last integral it should be :(1/(alpha).INT[(exp(-alpha.v^2).dv]
Which is twice the value obtained in the text.

My reasoning: integration by parts: d(a.b)= a.db +b.da
Here :a=(v^2) and da=2.v.dv

b=-[(1/(2.alpha.v).exp(-alpha.v^2)] and db=exp(-alpha.v^2)

In this case the integral in question becomes INT[b.da] or

INT[ -[(1/(2.alpha.v).exp(-alpha.v^2)]. 2.v.dv] which simplifies to

(1/alpha). INT[(exp(-alpha.v^2).dv] and NOT ( 1/(2.alpha).INT[(exp(-alpha.v^2).dv].

Where am I making a mistake here?
Thank you for any input!


Eric T. S.

1 Expert Answer

By:

Bobosharif S. answered • 02/26/18

Tutor
4.4 (32)

Mathematics/Statistics Tutor

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.