
John R. answered 01/24/13
John R: Math, Science, and History Teacher
Glass is an amorphous solid. It does not have a crystal structure, but it is still a solid.
Jose F.
asked 01/24/13Someone please help with this question for my chemistry class. Is glass a liquid?
John R. answered 01/24/13
John R: Math, Science, and History Teacher
Glass is an amorphous solid. It does not have a crystal structure, but it is still a solid.
Stanton D. answered 02/11/13
Tutor to Pique Your Sciences Interest
For a liquid, if we can't perceive any measurable flow, does it matter if we can extrapolate it and show it's negligible? That's poor logical support! Rather, put some isotopically stable ions on it, and check if they show signs of incorporation (i.e. migration of paricles => liquid characteristic).
Another way of thinking of this issue, is that solid/liquid/gas are convenient descriptions for most *pure* materials. Bulk properties become more entangled across this spectrum when you have complex, variable mixtures such as typical glasses. And the boundaries of physical properties can become blurred in other ways -- such as at a critical point.
Roman C. answered 01/26/13
Masters of Education Graduate with Mathematics Expertise
On another point all together, before it was discovered that that amorphous state is type of solid state, scientists erroneously assumed that it was a liquid of extremely high viscosity. Indeed, highly stable amorphous solids do behave like a super viscous liquid if a long period of time passes without them crystalizing. This can be seen in old window panes that have non-uniform thickness, as can be seen when you look through them and see objects a bit distorted. As a result, early scientists used the term "super-cooled liquid".
Today there are three types of solid recognized, amorphous, quasicrystals, and crystals.
As for a super-cooled liquid, it is a liquid that has been cooled below freezing point without actually freezing. If a super-cooled liquid is disturbed, it immediately begins to freeze solid.
One other feature of amorphous solids, is that when it begins to crystallize, it becomes brittle at the point where the process starts. This is due to building stress at the site. If you touch the amorphous object, even gently, at such a point, it can spontaneously shatter.
Daniel O. answered 01/24/13
Math and Physics Tutor, with a math and physics degree
Matt and John are correct, it is a solid.
I heard from a couple of teachers in high school that it is a very viscous liquid, and that this is evidenced by the windows in old churches, where the glass is thicker at the bottom than the top. This is supposedly due to the glass flowing down toward the base of the window over time, but it's much more likely that the windows were originally made in this way.
Some materials may appear to be solid at room temperature, but are actually very viscous liquids. For example, the pitch drop experiment - in 80 years only eight drops have fallen: http://smp.uq.edu.au/content/pitch-drop-experiment - you can even watch the live (and very boring) video of it.
Matt L. answered 01/24/13
MIT/Harvard Grad for Academic Tutoring & Test Prep
Arthur S.
I think there is some confusion as to what the definition of a liquid is. Yes liquids take the shape of their containers and thus pour. This does not however mean that it is the only definition. Liquids have molecules that are farther apart from their solid counterparts. This being the case, while glass after many many years will exhibit thinness at the top and thickness at the bottom so it does in some sense flow just not what you would expect from a typical liquid. Metals do not exhibit this as iron or copper can't do this but glass does.
Also, heating anything to its melting point changes to the liquid state provided the substance doesn't sublime of course and this statement offers no proof of anything except phase change.
There is nothing wrong with saying it behaves in some way as a liquid though it is not by definition one.
I always like to keep an open mind here about things.
01/24/13
Daniel O.
Arthur, as I said in my comment, it's much more likely that those glass windows were originally thinner at the top and thicker at the bottom, due to the manufacturing processes at the time. Glass flowing is very likely a myth.
"If glass flows at a rate that allows changes to be seen with the naked eye after centuries, then the effect should be noticeable in antique telescopes. Any slight deformation in the antique telescopic lenses would lead to a dramatic decrease in optical performance, a phenomenon that is not observed"
This is one of many sites that shoots down the myth: http://www.glassnotes.com/WindowPanes.html
01/26/13
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Daniel O.
Roman, as I said in my comment, it's much more likely that those glass windows were originally thinner at the top and thicker at the bottom, due to the manufacturing processes at the time. Glass flowing is very likely a myth.
"If glass flows at a rate that allows changes to be seen with the naked eye after centuries, then the effect should be noticeable in antique telescopes. Any slight deformation in the antique telescopic lenses would lead to a dramatic decrease in optical performance, a phenomenon that is not observed"
This is one of many sites that shoots down the myth: http://www.glassnotes.com/WindowPanes.html
01/27/13