I'll use the variable A for the 3000000 sq ft area enclosed by the fence (just so everything looks neater when I type it out here).
We know the area is a rectangle, so A must be equal to length*width. If we mark the shorter side of the fence as x, the length of the other side has to be A/x. The total perimeter of the rectangle (and thus the required length of fence to enclose A) is P=2x+2A/x.
______________A/x________________
| |
|x A | x
| |
|________________________________|
A/x
We are not told how the rancher splits A into two, but there are only two possibilities:
______________A/x________________ _______________A/x______________
| | | | |
| | | x |_______________________________| x
| | | | |
|_______________|_______________ | |_______________________________|
If the rancher wants to use the least amount of fencing, A should be split parallel to the shorter side, so that the length of the dividing fence is x.
This means the total fencing used equals the perimeter plus the divider: F= (2x+2A/x)+x = 3x+2A/x. We can now use optimization to find the length x that will use up the least amount of fencing F.
Taking the derivative:
F' = 3-2A/x2
Set equal to zero and solve for the critical points:
0=3-2A/x2
3=2A/x2
x2=2A/3
x=±√[2A/3].
We can reject the x value corresponding to a nonphysical answer, and substitute the usable value into our function for the total fencing.
Kimberly K.
10/21/15