AK K.

asked • 05/15/24

How to write proper nuclear reactions?

a) Beta-decay of radon-222

b) Alpha-decay of uranium-238

1 Expert Answer

By:

Devany D. answered • 05/15/24

Tutor
New to Wyzant

Physics undergrad from MIT with 8 years of teaching experience

AK K.

Hi! Thanks so much for getting back! For both questions, do you think you could provide a bit of clarity on how the resulting nuclei were achieved? For example, where and how does the Francium-222 and Thorium-234 come into the equation? Is it found by finding the number of protons and subtracting it by the beta/alpha particle? Also does the average atomic mass generally tend to vary across periodic table of elements? The one I use labels Thorium's atomic mass at 90^232, but I've noticed you have 90^234 written instead. 👀 (Superscript doesn't seem to work for me so I used the '^' symbol before the atomic mass no. haha) Much thanks in advance! Hope you have a great day as well! 💜🌻
Report

05/15/24

Devany D.

Hi! Sure - I am happy to help! I agree that typing the superscript in the comment is super messy, but if it comes down to it, I can edit my original answer where I can type super/sub-script. I also realized I could not bold or underline any font, so I will try my best to section this response without overwhelming you with words :D To answer your first three questions by trying to break down the logic behind the problem - but yes, you subtract the corresponding number of proton/neutron/... emitted due to the particle ================================================= a) Beta-decay of radon-222 Starting Nucleus: Radon-222 has 86 protons and 136 neutrons (222 - 86 = 136). Beta Decay Process: A neutron in the nucleus transforms into a proton, emitting an electron (beta particle) and an antineutrino. Resulting Nucleus: The atomic number increases by 1 (from 86 to 87 because a neutron is transformed into a proton), and the mass number remains the same (because the total number of neutron and the proton is the same) Thus, the resulting nucleus is Francium-222, which has 87 protons and 135 neutrons (222 - 87 = 135). ================================================= b) Alpha-decay of uranium-238 Starting Nucleus: Uranium-238 has 92 protons and 146 neutrons (238 - 92 = 146). Alpha Decay Process: The nucleus emits an alpha particle, which is a helium-4 nucleus (2 protons and 2 neutrons). Resulting Nucleus: The atomic number decreases by 2 (from 92 to 90 because 2 protons are emitted), and the mass number decreases by 4 (from 238 to 234 because 4 protons and neutrons in total are emitted). Thus, the resulting nucleus is Thorium-234, which has 90 protons and 144 neutrons (234 - 90 = 144). ================================================= Q: Does the average atomic mass generally tend to vary across the periodic table of elements? Thorium-232 vs Thorium234? A: The atomic mass of an element listed in the periodic table is the *weighted average* of all its isotopes' masses based on their *natural abundance* (** means bold). However, there also exists different isotopes of an element, which means they have the same number of protons, but different number of neutrons. In our case, Thorium-232 and Thorium-234 are both isotopes of Thorium, but with different neutron counts. Thorium-232 is the one that is the most abundant and the most stable in the nature, but Thorium-234 also exist :) As I mentioned previously, Thorium-234 has 144 neutrons, which you can get by subtracting 234 by 90 (90 is the proton number, and it always stays the same for the same element). Keep in mind that, in the case of nuclear reactions, the specific isotopes involved are what matter. Small exercise for you: for the naturally abundant Thorium-232, how many proton does it have? How would you write it? I hope that helps!
Report

05/15/24

Devany D.

OK... that did not format out nicely... I apologize for it :( I hope you can still understand this without issues... I have amended a more readable version of this in the original answer, let me know if you have more questions!
Report

05/15/24

AK K.

Hi! Ahaha, no problem~ I've noticed the formatting does get messy after sending in a comment, but I absolutely appreciate your help anyways! :D! ========== So what I've understood is... Using any isotope for any element would be correct, but using an isotope that's more common and stable is preferred when making calculations right? :0 For the small exercise: With the notation Z^AX, Thorium-234 is written as 90^234 Th And Thorium-232 would be written as 90^232 Th which isn't much different comparatively. ========== As for the beta/alpha decay part... If I were to use another example and write a nuclear reaction for an Alpha decay of Radium-226, it would be written as: (Initial Nucleus: 88^226 Ra) (Alpha particle: 2^4 He) (Resulting nucleus: 86^222 Rn) which becomes (88^226 Ra ----> 86^222 Rn + 2^4 He) ========== It seems about right, so I think I've finally got the gist of it!! Thank you so so much for all the help!! ^ J^💜💜🌻🌻
Report

05/15/24

Devany D.

Yes! With the initial calculation, you would want to use the naturally abundant one (the one listed on your periodic table), unless stated otherwise. And if you get an answer that is an isotope, you don't have to worry too much if that didn't match what you see on your periodic table :) ============== Your example and the small exercise both look correct to me! Congrats on mastering intro to nuclear physics 🌻💜🌻💜
Report

05/16/24

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.