Andrew B. answered 05/09/24
PhD in Applied Physics with 10+ Years of College Teaching Experience
Unfortunately, I'm unable to see the figure, but I can say the following based on what was written:
a) The Law of Refraction is nA sin θA = nB sin θB, where n is the index of refraction and θ is the angle of refraction for that material. Since the product of n and sin θ is a constant, they are inversely proportional. So, if the angle of refraction for A is greater than the index of refraction for B (θA > θB), that means the index of refraction for A must be less than the index of refraction for B (nA < nB). In other words, if the angle goes down, the index must be up
b) A useful way to think about this is imagining light going through a window with no curvature. In that case, the light wouldn't bend going through it. Moreover, a perfectly flat surface corresponds to an infinite radius (meaning you would have to be infinitely far away to see any curvature). However, as soon as the window is bent, the radius becomes smaller and more noticeable, and the light would bend as well. This means that the focal length and the radius are inverse of each other.
As for the the index of refraction, lets go back to the Law of Refraction: nA sin θA = nB sin θB. The index of refraction for a vacuum is 1 and the smallest possible value. Imagine that light is coming from a vacuum and strikes a material that also has an index of 1. The light would not bend in this case, or you could say that it has an infinite focal length (meaning that the light rays converge or diverge infinitely far away). The index for the lens can only increase, and increasing the index deflects the light. The only way it can bend is closer to the lens, meaning that the focal length decreases. Therefore, the focal length length ends up being inversely related to the index of refraction as well!
c) The thin lens equation is 1/s + 1/p = 1/f, where f is the focal length, s is the object distance, and p is the image distance. This equation can be rearranged to solve for the image distance: p = sf / (s-f)The object is placed at a distance of f/2 in front of the lens, which would be our value for s. Inserting that into our image distance equation, we have
p = sf / (s - f) = (f/2 · f) / (f/2 - f) = (f2 / 2) / (-f/2) = -f
Alternatively: 1/s + 1/p = 1/f. 1/(f/2) + 1/p = 1/f. 2/f + 1/p = 1/f. 1/f = -1/p, or p = -f
Now as to which side of the lens the image forms, it depends on if we have a convex lens (+f) or a concave lens (-f). A positive image distance is real, meaning the light rays converge, and the image forms on the opposite side of the lens as compared to the original object. A negative image distance is virtual, meaning the light rays diverge and the image forms on the same side of the lens as the original object.
d) Going back to our reasoning in B, we have that the focal length is inversely related to the index of refraction. Going from Air to Glass is an increase in the index of refraction, but going from Water to Glass is a decrease, so as the comparative index of refraction goes down, the focal length goes up! Furthermore, since the light in the glass increases instead of decreasing, the light bends in the opposite way and the focal length ends up being negative