
Nick C. answered 10/23/22
Worked at worlds largest HF, 2 IB internships, 1 CM/FF internship
This is a relatively straightforward NPV problem. Let me show you how to set it up:
- Let us consider option A: Investing $10000 in upgrades today and earn $20000 per year for the next three years. To do this, we will first write out the cash flow by year.
CF0 = –$10,000
CF1 = $20,000
CF2 = $20,000
CF3 = $20,000
We will now discount the ones in the future at the interest rate of 8% to bring them back to present value.
PV(CFt)=CF/(1+r)t
PVCF1 = $20,000/(1+.08)^1 = $18,518.52
PVCF2 = $20,000/(1+.08)^2 = $17,146.78
PVCF3 = $20,000/(1+.08)^3 = $15,876.64
Let us sum these up to get the NPV.
NPV = CF0 + PVCF1 + PVCF2 + PVCF3 = –$10,000 + $18,518.52 + $17,146.78 + $15,876.64 = $41,541.94
- Let us now consider option B: Do nothing and earn $16500 per year for the next three years. To do this, we will first write out the cash flow by year.
CF0 = $0
CF1 = $16,500
CF2 = $16,500
CF3 = $16,500
We will now discount the ones in the future at the interest rate of 8% to bring them back to present value.
PV(CFt)=CF/(1+r)t
PVCF1 = $16,500/(1+.08)^1 = $15,277.78
PVCF2 = $16,500/(1+.08)^2 = $14,146.09
PVCF3 = $16,500/(1+.08)^3 = $13,098.23
Let us sum these up to get the NPV.
NPV = CF0 + PVCF1 + PVCF2 + PVCF3 = $0 + $15,277.78 + $14,146.09 + $13,098.23 = $42,522.10
Interestingly, we may see that the NPV of option B is higher than the NPV of option A. Therefore, we may conclude that doing nothing and earn $16,500 per year for the next three years is the best option.

Charles W.
10/24/22