Scott B. answered 05/03/22
PhD in physics with one year experience as a professor
This is a standard application of the angular kinematic equations
Δθ=ω0t+1/2 αt2
ωf=ω0+αt
ωf2=ω02+2αΔθ
(A helpful hint: if you can't remember what these equations are, just take the kinematics for linear motion with x, v, and a and replace each variable with its angular counterpart. You'll get a valid rotational kinematic!)
Note that these only apply if the angular acceleration α is a constant. The problem doesn't say that explicitly, but we must assume it to make progress.
From the statement of the problem, we can deduce that ω0=2.3 rad/s, ωf=1.11 rad/s, and Δθ=5*2π=10π rad (5 revolutions is 10π rads). We are tasked with finding t. Unfortunately, None of these kinematics relates our known quantities to our unknown; the first two involve t but also the unknown α, and the last equation only has α. But this gives us an avenue forward; we can use the third kinematic to find α, and then either of the first two to find t.
ωf2=ω02+2αΔθ -> α=(ωf2-ω02)/(2Δθ)
And
ωf=ω0+αt -> t=(ωf-ω0)/α
I like to work symbollically (In part because it helps reduce errors when substituting in numbers), so I'll go ahead and do that, but you could just stop here, put in the numbers to get α, and then use the number for α to get t.
t=(ωf-ω0)/α = (ωf-ω0) (2Δθ) / (ωf2-ω02) = 2Δθ/(ωf+ω0)
And now, the answer:
t=2Δθ/(ωf+ω0)=2(10π)/(1.11+2.3)=20π/3.41=18.43s
--------------------------------
It's worth noting that there is a fourth kinematic that is not used as much as the others
Δθ=1/2 (ωf+ω0)t
Which technically I derived above. If you already know this kinematic exists, you can skip straight to here and solve things much faster.