Daniel B. answered 12/25/21
A retired computer professional to teach math, physics
I will speculate that your notation means
F(t) = y(t).ex - x(t).ey + z(t).ez
where ex is the unit vector in the x-direction,
ey is the unit vector in the y-direction, and
ez is the unit vector in the z-direction.
And (x, y, z) is the position vector of the ball, given by
(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = r(t) = t.ex + ey - t.ez
Plugging into F(x,y,z):
F(t) = ex - t.ey - t.ez
a)
By definition of work, W is the definite integral from 0 to 10
W = ∫F.dr (1)
The derivative
dr/dt = ex - ez
So
dr = (ex - ez)dt
Plugging both F and dr into (1)
W = ∫(ex - t.ey - t.ez).(ex - ez)dt
= ∫(1 + t)dt
= (t + t²/2) between 0 and 10
= 10 + 10²/2 = 60 J
b)
The force is potential iff its curl is 0.
curl(F(x,y,z)) = (∂Fz/∂y - ∂Fy/∂z)ex + (∂Fx/∂z - ∂Fz/∂x)ey + (∂Fy/∂x - ∂Fx/∂y)ez
= (0 - 0)ex + (0 - 0)ey + (-1 - 1)ez = -2ez
Therefore the force is not potential.
c)
By Newton's Second Law the net force is
md²r/dt² = 1.d²/dt²(t.ex + ey - t.ez) = d/dt(ex - ez) = 0
The net force is 0, which is different from F.
Actually that was quite clear at the outset, because r(t) is a straight line with constant velocity.