Rahul A.

asked • 09/05/21

average velocity and uniform and non uniform acceleration.

Consider this table, just for example.


at; t=1 v=1


at; t=2 v=3 


at; t=3 v=6


at; t=4 v=7


My doubts:

Here we can see that the acceleration isn't constant, but does it mean that it isn't constant between time interval 1-2


What i want to know is like we say that the acceleration is not constant between interval 1-2, so in examples where the acceleration is constant(like free falling body).how do we say that it is indeed constant in every interval.


 In examples of constant acceleration, we say that acceleration between a certain interval is constant, i mean in every interval it is constant, so if we assume it constant there in an interval, then why not here in non uniform acceleration for a interval i mean.


In a example of non uniform acceleration, like i have mentioned above why can't we use this formula v1+v2/2 

why can't we say that the object travelled a displacement of 2mts in the interval 1-2? in the above example, 1+3/2 will give 2m/s as the average velocity for the interval 1-2 secs so the displacement/distance travelled can be 2m/s X 1 sec= 2mts. i know this is done in examples where acceleration is constant but why can't we apply this here.why can't the acceleration be constant for intervals(some intervals) where acceleration is non uniform.


you can take your own example


thank you.


1 Expert Answer

By:

William W. answered • 09/05/21

Tutor
4.9 (1,021)

Experienced Tutor and Retired Engineer

Rahul A.

ok thanks, but in constant acceleration how can we say that an acceleration is constant at a particular interval,like it is constant for intervals 1-2 2-3 3-4 and so on... but what about if we take a particular interval, for instance 1-2 and chop it down into 4 or say 5 intervals,then is it constant for that intervals too? so how can we use the formula v1+v2/2 there if we don't know whether it is constant in between the interval too. and also why can't we say then in non uniform motion, that for a particular interval the acceleration was constant. coz acceleration is given by v2 st an instant minus v1 at an instant. we ignore the fact what happens in between a interval in constant acceleration example too. right?
Report

09/08/21

William W.

You’re trying too hard to force a situation into constant acceleration. If an acceleration is close to being constant and you then use the equations associated with constant acceleration, then your answers will be close. The closer the acceleration gets to being constant, the closer your answers will be to reality. If you can define acceleration as a function, then you can define velocity or position exactly. The question all boils down to “how close do you want your answers to be to reality?”
Report

09/08/21

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.