Tom K. answered 05/19/21
Knowledgeable and Friendly Math and Statistics Tutor
You need to verify that the roots are not also roots of the numerator, in which case you might have holes rather than asymptotes.
In the first problem, we know that -4 is not a root, as 4 does not divide 7. With 7, we can verify by substituting that it is not a root.
Thus, x = -4 and x = 7 will be vertical asymptotes.
With the second fraction, we need to go through similar steps. There is a cubic formula, but few use it. From the sign rule, we know that there is at most one positive and 2 negative roots, and we are guaranteed at least one root.
We can see that 2 is a root and use synthetic division. Alternatively, we could just graph and spot the 0s at whole numbers and verify.
2 | 1 2 -5 -6
2 8 6
1 4 3 0
x^2 + 4x +3 = (x+3)(x+1), so we have additional roots -3 and -1
We can now check -3, -1, and 2 with the numerator
x^5 + 4x^3 - 4x + 6; no easy elimination, as 3, 1, and 2 divide 6.
f(-1) = 5;
f(-3) = -33;
f(2) = 62
None of the roots of the denominator is a root of the numerator, so all are vertical asymptotes.
x = -3 x = -1 and x = 2 are vertical asymptotes.