Raymond B. answered 03/27/21
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
The following involves some tedious calculations. With luck maybe they're right.
IF so, the answer is produce zero, and incur only the fixed costs of $1,120
the basic method is take the derivative of the cost function, set it equal to zero and solve for q
then plug that q value into the cost function, then compare it with both C(0) and C(50), the end points.
Seems to turn out that C(0) < C(25) < C(50), same with profit levels
Price = AR = Average Revenue = per unit revenue = 579
Cost = C = q^3 -75q^2 + 1875q + 1120
Take the derivative of Cost and set it equal to zero
C'(q) = 3q^2 -150q + 1875 = 0, divide by 3
= q^2 - 50q + 625 = 0
= q^2 -50q = -625
= q^2 -50q + 625 =- 625 + 625 =0
= (q-25)^2 = 0
= q=25
C(25) = 25^3 - 75(25)^2 + 1875(25) + 1120= 16,745
C(0) = fixed cost = 1120
C(50) = (50)^3 - 75(50)^2 + 1875(50) + 1120 = 31,250
cost minimizing output level = 0
Profit(0) =-1120
Profit(25) = 579(25) - 16,745 = 14,475 - 16,745 = -2270 worse than shutting down, slightly over twice as bad
Profit(50) = 14475- 31,250 = -16775 far worse than q=25 or q=0
Profit maximizing (or really loss minimizing) output level = q=0, just shutdown
at that production level, total cost = fixed cost = $1,120, variable costs =0
total revenue = 0
total profit = negative 1120
the cost curve is cubic, which usually has a local max and min, but this curve has neither, just an inflection point at q=25. cost is everywhere increasing. Cost minimizing q = 0