Chloe B.
asked 02/04/21A skateboarder with a mass of 82.9kg is on top of a hill of height 2.8m. What will be the final velocity at the bottom if no energy is lost due to friction?
A skateboarder with a mass of 82.9kg is on top of a hill of height 2.8m. What will be the final velocity at the bottom if no energy is lost due to friction?
2 Answers By Expert Tutors
Stanton D. answered 02/04/21
Tutor to Pique Your Sciences Interest
Hi Chloe B.,
Just set up your Conservation of Energy equation:
Gravitational Potential Energy = Kinetic Energy gained
mgh =(1/2) mv^2
Now, you may cancel the mass on each side (identical terms) to get"
gh = (1/2)v^2
v^2 = 2gh
Next, plug in your knowns: (you should memorize the value for g)
=2*(9.8m s^-2)(2.8 m)
Solve on through, then take the square root.
-- Cheers, -- Mr. d.
Davide M. answered 02/04/21
Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics and Master Degree in Theoretical Physics
If no energy is lost due to friction, you can apply the principle of conservation of energy.
At the top of the hill, the kinetic energy KE is zero since the skateboard is at rest. It's potential energy is given by PE=mgh where m is the mass of the skateboard, g is the gravitational acceleration, and h is the height of the hill. Therefore the total energy TE is given by TE=KE+PE=mgh.
At the bottom of the hill, the kinetic energy KE will be KE=0.5mv2 and the potential energy will be PE=0 since you are at height equal zero. The total energy at the bottom of the hill is given by TE=KE+PE=0.5mv2
The total energy must be conserved and hence, mgh=0.5mv2 which implies v=(2gh)1/2
With the numbers you have v=(2x2.8x82.9)1/2≈21.54 m/s
Best,
Davide
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Stanton D.
There is always some energy lost due to friction in any real process. So the final velocity at the bottom will not exist, because the skateboarder stayed on top so as to acknowledge this aspect of reality. -- But see additional comments under Answer section.02/04/21