Daniel B. answered 10/31/20
A retired computer professional to teach math, physics
The correct answer is 4), but I do not have an analytical solution.
This is my reasoning.
For f to be continuous at 2, the two definitions must agree for x = 2.
That is,
e2b = 3 + b
So we are looking for roots of the function
g(b) = e2b - 3 - b
(I) First we prove that it must have 2 roots.
Compute
g'(b) = 2e2b - 1
g''(b) = 4e2b
Since the second derivative g"(b) is always positive, the function g(b) is convex.
And it goes to infinity as b goes to +infinity or -infinity.
(That is seen easily by considering its asymptotic behavior.)
We compute the minimum of the function by setting its derivative to 0.
2e2b - 1 = 0
b = ln(1/2)/2
Now we check that g(b) is negative at this minimum.
g(ln(1/2)/2) = 1/2 - 3 - ln(1/2)/2 < 0
Now that we know that there exists b where g(b) < 0 and that g(b) > 0 for b sufficiently
large and b sufficiently small, we know that g(b) must have 2 roots.
(II) This leaves us with option 3) or 4).
Now we prove that it must be 4) by evaluating
g(-2) = e-4 - 3 + 2 = e-4 - 1 < 0
The last inequality follows from the fact that e-4 < 1.
Since g(-2) < 0, it must have a root < -2.
That leaves only option 4)