Raymond B. answered 04/25/20
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
Add (3(n+1)+5) to both sides
then try to reduce the right side to the form (n+1)/2(3(n+1)+13)
transform n/2(3n+13) + (3(n+1)+5) into (n+1)/2(3(n+1)+13
first show it's true for n=1
as the 1st term is 8, and (3(1)+5) = 8 and 1/2(3+13) = 16/2 = 8
then show it's true for n=2
as the 2nd term is 11 and 2/2(3x2+13) = (19) = 8 + 11, the sum of the first two terms
then assume it is true for (3n+5), for all n, and that that leads to its being true for (3(n+1)+5)
That's the tricky part. requiring some algebra and manipulations
but you can see it's true, let n=3
left side is 8 + 11 + (3n+5) = 8+11+14 = 33
for n=4
8+11+14+17 = 33+17 = 50
the right side for n=4 is 4/2 (3x4+13) = 2(12+13) = 2(25)=50