
Jade D. answered 03/20/20
Patient instructor with a healthy sense of humor and candor
Hi there. Let me help you out.
- First, ponder over how the frequency of a wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength. It is important to recognize which numbers represent which quantities. In this exercise, the frequency of a light wave (which is usually denoted ƒ) is provided along with a kind-of-a-hint that the other quantity you will be using is the speed of light, c. At this point you should search through the EM section of a sheet of relevant equations to find the equation which relates f, c, and wavelength (typically denoted λ). The correct equation to discover is the wave identity relating frequency and wavelength via the velocity of the wave, ƒ = ν/λ. In the case of EM waves, this then looks like ƒ = c/λ. Always keeping track of units, we rearrange terms in order to solve for the wavelength in meters as follows:
- ƒ = c/λ ⇒ λ = c/ƒ = (3×108 ms-1) / (4×108 s-1) = 0.75 m.
- This second question is the reverse procedure of the first question. Simply plug the numbers into the original equation we used in 1.:
- ƒ = c/λ = (3×108 ms-1) / (300 m) = 106 s-1 = 106 Hz.
- In this question, we are concerned with how light traveling through some material appears to slow to a velocity of 7.5×107 ms-1 (I chose 7.5×107 ms-1 instead of 7.5×108 ms-1 because the latter is physically unreasonable, being greater than the vacuum speed of light) whilst traveling through the material. The material is, in a way, slowing the light by causing it to bounce off of the atoms located in the materials over and over as it attempts to escape the material. The material is uniform for our intents and purposes. Let v be the speed of light in the material. Observe that 0 < v < c. It is reasonable to think that there should be a relationship between v and c, and there is: they are related by the index of refraction, n. Since the speed of light in a vacuum is constant and also the maximum velocity of light (and of anything in the Universe, it seems for now), we know that 1 < c/v < ∞ (just try different values for v to convince yourself of this if you are unsure). It turns out that n = c/v, so we have for our answer:
- n = c/v = (3×108 ms-1) / (7.5×107 ms-1) = 4.
Jade D.
Part 1 is in meters, not Hertz. Part 2 is fine. Part 3 is physically unreasonable and thus should not be answered like this.03/20/20