Steven W. answered 08/02/19
Physics Ph.D., college instructor (calc- and algebra-based)
Mark's answer about forces is right on. Newton's first law,of motion sets out what a force is, directly:
"An object will remain at rest, or in motion at constant velocity, unless acted on by an unbalanced force."
A force (which is not balanced out by another; in other word, a NET force) changes velocity. If the velocity of an object changes, a force must be acting on it. If no unbalanced for is acting, velocity will not change. Newton's second law of motion says how the force affects velocity (in other words, how it is related to acceleration).
If the object's velocity does not change, Newton's laws say the acceleration is 0, and do not distinguish between whether it is 0 because the object is at rest, or in motion at constant velocity. This means that, if a net force is applied to a system which previously had a = 0, the experience of that force will be the same whether the system is at rest or in motion at constant velocity,
In the example you propose, you specify a constant rate of change in kinetic energy. I don't think this is particularly realistic for the given situation (since it would require all the work-producing forces in the situation of rocket propulsion to be conservative), but we can specify that. In that case, for reasons we can go into if you like, you end up with a speed-dependent force; specifically, a force inversely related to speed. Speed-dependent forces are not in any way forbidden (in fact, one of them, drag, often comes up in fundamental classes). But that is the reason the force magnitude changes over the flight: because of the kinetic energy condition, not because the force is somehow being fundamentally different.
Also, there is no fundamental reason to expect a constant force if energy consumption is constant.
If you have any further questions about any of that, please feel free to ask,