Julie C. answered 1h
Real-World Business Expert | Helping Students Excel in Class
1. Git with text extraction
You can set up Git to use a converter (like docx2txt
or a textconv filter) so when you commit a .docx
, Git extracts the plain text for diffs.
- Pros: Works inside Git, simple once configured.
- Cons: You’ll only see text changes; formatting, tables, or images won’t show clearly.
2. Word’s built-in Compare function
Use Word itself to compare two versions of a document. This shows differences in a “track changes” style.
- Pros: Captures text and formatting changes, very accurate for Word features.
- Cons: Requires opening Word manually, not integrated with Git diffs.
3. Git with conversion to Markdown (via Pandoc)
Convert .docx
files to Markdown before committing. Git will then show diffs in Markdown.
- Pros: Lets you see readable text diffs in GitHub/GitLab.
- Cons: Formatting changes aren’t well captured; layout-heavy docs lose fidelity.
4. Dedicated Word versioning tools
There are tools designed specifically for Word version control that show changes in a familiar Word interface.
- Pros: Strong support for formatting and collaborative editing.
- Cons: Usually external to Git, sometimes paid.
5. Hybrid approach
- Store
.docx
binaries in Git for safekeeping. - Use a diff driver that either extracts text or calls Word’s Compare function when you want to see changes.
- This gives you Git’s version history plus Word’s formatting-aware diffs.