In all logic questions asking whether something "must be" true or false, it is usually easiest to try to figure out any exceptions to the statement. In other words, if something "must be true," then to disprove it, we only need one example of its being false. This is usually much easier than trying to prove that the statement is true. Since your question requires that statements are either 100% true or false, you must look for exceptions to either case:
a. Is it 100% true? No, because they could just have all 15 hikers on one boat. (Caveat: If you read the statement as "Some boat will be used by 2 hikers, but there may also be other hikers on the boat," then this is 100% true (see b. below); If you read the statement as "Some boat will be used by exactly 2 hikers," then this could be false.).
Is it 100% false? No, two hikers could definitely be on one boat: 2 hikers on three boats; 1 hiker on the other 9 boats.
b. Is it 100% true? Yes, because there are more hikers than boats. (Note: this is true even if you can make more than one trip across, unless the boats can return to the first side by themselves.)
Is it 100% false? No, two or more hikers could definitely be on one boat: all 15 on one boat.
c. Is it 100% true? No, 15 hikers on one boat.
Is it 100% false? No, 2 hikers on three boats; 1 hiker on the other 9 boats.
d. Is it 100% true? No, 15 hikers on one boat.
Is it 100% false? No, 2 hikers on three boats; 1 hiker on the other 9 boats.
Some amount of proof will sometimes be necessary (see b. above) and even easy, but it is very often easier to disprove a 100%/must be/always statement.
Cheers,
Ashley
PS - Look up "scientific method" for more on this "only one exception" principle.
Peter H.
06/16/14