Hi Cassandra,
Well, there are two ways to go about this, and I don't know which one your book/teacher wants. So, I'll give a few hints, and see if any of those help.
Method #1
Some textbooks give a direct formula for the vertex of a parabola, if you're given the equation in standard form. That's what you have: y = ax2 + bx + c. That's standard form. The important numbers are the coefficients, so in your case, "a" is the number in front of the x2 (including the negative sign), "b" is the number in front of the "x," and "c" is the constant at the end.
The vertex of a parabola is usually given in terms of h (the x coordinate) and k (the y coordinate). So, if you're looking for the point at (h, k), does your book give you a formula to figure out h & k based on the values of "a" "b" and "c"? If so, plug 'em in, do the arithmetic, and poof, you have your vertex.
Method #2
Other textbooks don't give you a formula. Instead, they expect you to take the standard form of an equation and convert it into vertex form:
4p(y - k) = (x - h)2
There are other ways of writing it, too, but the important parts are the (y - k) and the (x - h)2. The "h" and the "k" are the coordinates of the vertex...just like in Method #1. The problem is that your parabola isn't written in that form! :) So, ya gotta convert it.
Without going too much further, the method is called "completing the square." You have -2x2 + 8x. If you factor out the -2 in front of the x2, you still have something with x squared, and then something times x. The goal is to be able to write the equation in vertex form. See the (x - h) thing up above? It's squared. If you remember factoring equations with an x squared in them, they sometimes end up being perfect squares...both factors are the same. Like (x-2)(x-2). That's (x-2)2. Fancy way of writing it, but they're the same thing.
You need to find a number--a constant--that you can add to this situation so that, when you factor it, you get a perfect square, like (x - h)2. It's a quick little puzzle, and there's a shortcut to solve it.
And this is getting long. :) So, either you have a formula to figure out h and k from the original equation, or you have to complete the square, and then write the equation in vertex form...where you'll be able to see h and k pop out at you.
Does that help? Let us know, and I'm sure either I or someone else can help take it the rest of the way...
-- Michael
Michael W.
05/23/14