Hi Moe!
(a) Considering this only as an electric force problem, we can use conservation of energy (since the electric force is conservative).
The value of electric potential energy is defined as:
UE = kq1q2/r
where r is the distance between the charges (and we can keep the positive and negative signs on positive and negative charges).
When the proton is very, very far from the mercury nucleus, we have r --> ∞, meaning:
(UE)far= 0 (effectively)
At the far position, the proton is launched with speed 3.2 x 107 m/s. This is about one tenth the speed of light, which is a decent threshold for ignoring relativistic effects on the energy. Thus, the kinetic energy is:
KEfar = (1/2)mpv2
where
mp = mass of proton = 1.67x10-27 kg
v = 3.2 x 107 m/s
So, far from the mercury nucleus, the total energy of the proton is:
Efar = (UE)far + KEfar = 0 + KEfar = (1/2)mpv2
When the proton is at its closest approach to the mercury nucleus, if it is fired directly along a line, it will momentarily come to rest (just like a ball tossed directly up in the air will momentarily come to rest at its highest point). At that point:
(UE)close = kq1q2/rclose
where
q1 = proton charge = e (fundamental charge, e = 1.6x10-19 C)
q2 = mercury nucleus charge = Ze, where Z = atomic number of mercury (Z = 80, stated in the problem)
So
(UE)close = k(e)(80e)/rclose
At this point, the proton is momentarily at rest, so its kinetic energy is zero. So its total energy near is:
Eclose = (UE)close + KEclose = k(e)(80e)/rclose + 0 = 80ke2/rclose
By using conservation of energy to equate Efar and Eclose, you make an equation with only one unknown: rclose
Efar = Eclose
(1/2)mpv2 = 80ke2/rclose
Everything except rclose in this equation is either given in the problem or is a universal constant you can look up. From here, you can solve for rclose.
Now, for a uniform sphere of charge (which we can presume the nucleus to be), this distance (rclose) is measured from the proton (which we can assume is a point mass) to the center of the nucleus sphere. Hence, the distance of the proton from the surface of the nucleus at closest approach is rclose MINUS the radius of the nucleus, which you can calculate from given information.
(b) There are a couple ways to do this one, but since (a) involved energy (and work, in a way), we can do this one that way, too.
For a uniform electric field (such as we usually assume between the two plates of a capacitor), there is a direct relationship between electric potential and distance traveled along the field. The electric field points from positive charges (high potential) to negative charges (low potential). Thus, as you travel along the field in the direction it points, you go down in potential. If you travel along the field line opposite the way it points, you go up in potential.
The relationship for a uniform electric field between potential (or potential difference) and distance traveled along the field line between points a and b is:
Vab = Ed
where Vab is the potential change between points a and b, E is the electric field strength, and d is the d is the distance from a to b. With this, we can calculate the potential difference between the plates.
Vab = (2.4 x 104 N/C)(0.001 m)
The change in kinetic energy of the electron during this motion is equal to the net work done on it, and only the electric field if doing work (positive work, since the electron is moving the way it naturally "wants" to go). The value of the change in kinetic energy is:
W = ΔKE = KEf - KEo = qVab
In this case, q = e, and Vab was calculated above. So a value for KEf - KEo can be determined, and since the electron starts from rest (KEo = 0), this value equals KEf. Then:
KEf = (1/2)mev2
where
me = mass of the electron
v = electron's final speed
(this assumes again that relativity need not be considered here; that would change the form of the KE expression, if it were)
I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions, or would like to check an answer.
Moe A.
02/17/17