California Civil Code of 1905 Question

Question

Thank you for answering my last question, but i'm a little confused on this line : "Personal relations forbid. The rights of personal relations forbid: 

4. Injury to servant. Any injury to a servant which affects his ability to serve his master. En. March 21, 1872. Am'd. 1905,68."

 

This is probably a stupid question, but slavery was abolished in 1865? Why would the law print that out if by law slavery was abolished so why would they even print out about servants? 

Thank you!

 

Answer 1

According to:

https://casetext.com/statute/ca-civ-code-49-abuction-of-child-seduction-of-person-under-age-of-lebal-consent-injury-to-servant

it is still current through the 2016 California Legislative Session. It maybe a provision that was never excised.